Files
support_backend/tests/unit/identity/login-failure-parity.test.ts
T
saqib mirandClaude Sonnet 5 79bc2ef25b feat(013-auth-hardening): password reset, password strength policy, login rate-limiting
Closes the two gaps 010-identity-auth explicitly deferred (password reset,
login rate-limiting), plus a shared password-strength validator both the
reset-consume endpoint and admin account creation now depend on.

- Password reset: single-use, paired-Redis-key tokens (never in Postgres),
  identical response regardless of account existence, stubbed delivery via
  a structured log line (no email infrastructure exists yet).
- Password strength: one validatePasswordStrength() call site, wired into
  both POST /admin/users and the reset-consume flow.
- Login rate-limiting: checkRateLimit keyed by submitted email, checked
  before any credential verification.

Also fixes tests/helpers/auth.ts's shared loginAs() helper, which reused
two fixed accounts across the whole integration suite via upsert — now
rate-limited per email, that collided across ~30 files sharing one budget.
Each call now gets a unique email; no call sites needed to change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-07 21:22:49 +05:30

68 lines
2.2 KiB
TypeScript

import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest';
import bcrypt from 'bcryptjs';
import { AuthService } from '@/modules/identity/auth/service/auth.service';
import * as cache from '@/infrastructure/cache';
const REAL_PASSWORD_HASH = bcrypt.hashSync('the-real-password', 10);
function fakeUser(overrides: Partial<Record<string, unknown>> = {}) {
return {
id: 'u1',
email: 'agent@example.com',
name: 'Agent',
role: 'AGENT',
passwordHash: REAL_PASSWORD_HASH,
active: true,
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
...overrides,
};
}
describe('AuthService.login failure parity', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.spyOn(cache, 'checkRateLimit').mockResolvedValue({ allowed: true, count: 1 });
});
it('throws the identical error for a nonexistent email and a wrong password', async () => {
const repoFoundUser = { findByEmail: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(fakeUser()) } as never;
const repoNoUser = { findByEmail: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(null) } as never;
const serviceWithUser = new AuthService(repoFoundUser);
const serviceWithoutUser = new AuthService(repoNoUser);
let errorWithUser: Error | undefined;
let errorWithoutUser: Error | undefined;
try {
await serviceWithUser.login({ email: 'agent@example.com', password: 'definitely-wrong' });
} catch (e) {
errorWithUser = e as Error;
}
try {
await serviceWithoutUser.login({ email: 'nobody@example.com', password: 'anything' });
} catch (e) {
errorWithoutUser = e as Error;
}
expect(errorWithUser).toBeDefined();
expect(errorWithoutUser).toBeDefined();
expect(errorWithUser?.message).toBe(errorWithoutUser?.message);
expect((errorWithUser as { statusCode?: number })?.statusCode).toBe(
(errorWithoutUser as { statusCode?: number })?.statusCode,
);
});
it('rejects a deactivated account with the same error, never a distinguishable one', async () => {
const repo = {
findByEmail: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(fakeUser({ active: false })),
} as never;
const service = new AuthService(repo);
await expect(
service.login({ email: 'agent@example.com', password: 'anything' }),
).rejects.toMatchObject({ statusCode: 401 });
});
});