saqib mirandClaude Sonnet 5
0e92faf615
/speckit-specify output for 002-saas-integration (roadmap Phase 2): 3 user stories (authenticate/validate inbound requests, admin onboarding/rotation/revocation, rate limiting) and 12 functional requirements. Reserves an idempotency-key field on the inbound contract for the future ticketing feature (docs/11 gap A1) without implementing dedup here. Quality checklist passes with no NEEDS CLARIFICATION markers. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.6 KiB
1.6 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: SaaS Product Integration & Inbound Request Trust
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-08-21 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- Auth mechanism choice (signed tokens/OAuth2/mTLS) and rotation-window length are deliberately
left to
/speckit-plan, not decided here — see spec.md Assumptions. - Idempotency-key enforcement is explicitly deferred to the future ticketing feature (FR-012 reserves the field only); this is a scope boundary, not a gap.
- Exact rate-limit values and auth-mechanism-per-integration defaults are
REQUIRES BUSINESS CONFIRMATIONper docs/10-implementation-roadmap.md — not invented here. - All items pass; no revision iterations were needed.