saqib mirandClaude Sonnet 5
09ba56d3af
Phase 11's second sub-area (full observability), per explicit user direction. Scopes wiring the already-scaffolded logging/metrics/tracing into something actually functional, explicitly bounded away from the separate, not-yet-started reporting/analytics dashboards sub-area. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.9 KiB
1.9 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Full Observability
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-09-07 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- This is
docs/10-implementation-roadmap.md's own Phase 11, second sub-area, per explicit user direction (the first was 013-auth-hardening's security pass). The user explicitly chose "Full observability" over "Reporting/analytics dashboards" as a distinct, separately-scoped sub-area — FR-009 and several Assumptions exist specifically to keep this feature from drifting into that adjacent, not-yet-started work. - The three named infrastructure gaps (no per-request access log, a dead request-duration histogram, a never-initialized tracer) and all eleven "key metrics to track" being completely untracked today were confirmed by direct code inspection before writing this spec, not assumed.
- All items pass; no revision iterations were needed. No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers were required — every open question had a reasonable, documented default (see Assumptions).